He is one but infinite? Infinite but one?

Updated on June 19, 2022 in Avatars
7 on June 8, 2022

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Sri:

If he is one why is he considered infinite?
If he is infinite why is he considered one?

Dasanudasan

 
  • Liked by
Reply
0 on June 8, 2022

Srimate Raamanuajaya Namaha,

Swami as per vedas He is one person having infinite attributes in infinite quantities.

Adiyen

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
4 on June 10, 2022

Divisible non-duality?

Pruthak siddham?

Why one to many? Not many to one?

Dasanudasan

on June 10, 2022

Srimate Raaamnaujaye Namaha,
Swami, having infinite attributes is not being divisible.
One with many parts is visishta adwaitam. All parts are one is adwaitam.

Adiyen

on June 11, 2022

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha

Adiyen need more clarity swamy

Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy has told in Sahasranamam upanyasam adiyen beleive

EkO Vishnu: Mahath Bhutham Pruthak BhuthAn yanekasha:

Pruthak Siddham : Divisible
Apruthak Siddham : Non Divisible

Seperating blue color from Saree = Divisible = Pruthak

Trying to seperate white color from dhothi = Non-Divisible = Apruthak

The above were examples.

Adiyen understand , from second example, though white is an attribute of dhothi (Veshti), it is inseperable but distinguishable.

When we say many,
Are we talking only about the attributes or dhothi itself?

Sathyam nyAnam Anantham Nithyam Brahma

Is Sathyam itself God?
Is nyAnam itself God?

Athma Velukkudi told is both:
1. Containing nyAnam (nyAnam udayadhu)
2. Made up of nyAnam (nyAname)
3. Swayam PrakAshikA (self illuminatory no need of secondary light to display athmA just like sun)

As Shareeram to (bound) prakruthik AthmA (chith) is Achith & chith itself a shareeram to Brahmam

Is it okay to say collection of all jevAthmAs (infinite) is Brahmam ?

No. Unmanifested still exists.

So unmanifested (avyaktham i believe) + vyaktham (tangible) = Brahmam?

No

When it is Anantham , infinite, there is no question of many to one = Advaitam

You cannot create a set of {infinite} because the definition itself creates boundary to infinity which is wrong

So one to many
Not
Many to one

Please correct

Dasanudasan

on June 12, 2022

Srimate Raaamnuajaya Namaha,

Yes swamy as usual you have arrived at the answer yourself.

There were some small questions you had raised in between.

“Are we talking only about the attributes or dhothi itself?”
Attribite is possession of a person or thing.
Brahamam is one and other things cit and acit are many. So others automatically become attributes.

“Sathyam nyAnam Anantham Nithyam Brahma

Is Sathyam itself God?
Is nyAnam itself God?”

If each attribute becomes God, who will possess the other attributes?

But in some cases Lord s attributes is as good as the Lord..like Lord’s naama, Guna, roopa, Leela( katha).
So it is simultaneously one but different..which is called acintya bheda abedha principle/philosophy.

Adiyen

on June 13, 2022

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha

Super adiyen
“different..which is called acintya bheda abedha principle/philosophy”.

Incredible Swamy , will learn about it

If each attribute becomes God, who will possess the other attributes? ЁЯдФ

Dhanyosmi

Dasanudasan

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on June 19, 2022

роирооро╕рпНроХро╛ро░роорпН
роЪродрпНропроорпН роЮрпНроЮро╛ройроорпН роЕройроирпНродроорпН рокро┐ро░ро╣рпНрооро╛ роОройрпНрокродрпБ роЙрокроиро┐ро╖родрпНродрпБ ро╡ро╛роХрпНроХро┐ропроорпН,роЗродрпИ роЖро┤рпНро╡ро╛ро░рпН рокро╛роЪрпБро░роЩрпНроХро│ро┐ро▓рпН роорпЗро▒рпНроХрпЛро│рпН роХро╛роЯрпНроЯро┐ройро╛ро▓рпН родройрпНропройро╛ро╡рпЗройрпН
роЕроЯро┐ропрпЗройрпН
родро╛роЪройрпН

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel