Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thriruvadigaley Sharanam
Sri:
moovulagu uNdu umizhndha mudhalva! nin naamam katRa,
aavalip pudaimai kaNdaay arankamaa nakaruLaanE!
— Thondaradippodi Azhvaar’s Thirumaalai verse #1
As Vishnu swallowed all 3 worlds and emitted out all 3 worlds can Sri MahaVishNu be classified as a non-vegetarian?
One young upanyAsakar out of young blood assuming to expose “Brahmin ‘s diet” goes around in YouTube saying “Brahmins are non veg in olden days but resorted to Hyper SAthvik diet later on”.
Of course Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy also accepted the fact that in olden days diet practices were different.
If SAvthvikam was the only core motive, SriVaishNavites will be praying only Buddha and not any of the other avatArs in my humble opinion. A reaction less avatar.
That’s not the case.
In an EnPaNi Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy narrated a story mentioning Srimath BhAgavatham continents
If my remabrance is correct it’s called “Swetha Dweepam”. There people were white hearted. While Narada Muni prepared for Kalaham
Sriman Narayana said to Narada “They are too innocent to stand your politics” and stopped Narada from entering that landscape.
What does this say?
Earthly beings are of mixed nature Sathvam Rajas Tamas. The concept of “food for survival” could have existed.
As per yogic practice Dhruvan is seen as eating only air:
“VAyu Bhakshi”
and stopped even that. Kumbhakam I guess.
A true SriVaishNavite will never gain pleasure from someone’s pain.
If that is true Sathvika diet would have been the prescription from day 1.
In Bhagavath Gita, Krishna says “This is not the first time I am narrating Gita”.
Gita clearly advocates SAthvikam which in turn will lead to dropping of all Dharmas (including sAthvikam which could accumulate PuNya for a mere gain like heaven).
This means this has been the case for ages. So Brahmin eating non veg irrespective of yuga is a sin because it’s against the principles of SriVaishNavism “Jeeva KArUNyam”.
We cannot enlarge our stomach by eating someone’s stomach!!!
Animalistic nature of living was never part of SriVaishNavam.
The common crowd will not understand but commenting ” Thanks for exposing and accepting the fact”.
What’s the point of such YouTube shorts?
✓Uyarvara Uyarnalam
✓Sath Eva somya idham agram aaseth
He is the purest of pure. He is the Sath in SAthveekam.
Is VishNu a non veg?
Of course NOT because
Narayana Sukhtham UpaniShad says:
Athar Bahischa Tat Sarvam VyApta NArAyaNa sthitha:
Therefore there is no difference of in and out. Sriman Narayana is Omnipresent.
This is also proved when MArkandeya Maharishi asks ” What is VishNu MAyA?”
Markandeyan was seen to be swallowed by Sriman Narayana while Markandeyan was witnessing the act!!!
Also in Vishwaroopam to Arjuna
Krishna is seen as swallowing and emitting.
Let’s not confuse people.
Vishnu is the SAthvik God
SriVaishNavites are supposed to be sAthvikam worshippers
If someone has otherwise argument then it should be proven as to “how someone can remain sAthvikam even after eating non SAthvikam food” irrespective of Yuga Dharmam?
Dasanudasan
