Namaskaram.
As per shastram, whether male / female are not expected to think of a married female / male. Azwars, in their pasurams, express their spiritual desire as நாயிகா பாவம். Sriman Narayanan has consorts. Is that correct to express spiritual desire as நாயிகா பாவம் on Sriman Narayanan who has consorts. Or shastram is not applicable in this case and anyone can follow this.
adiyen
SriVaishnava dasan
Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Very simple. Woman is submissive by nature. She is naturally passive. Male is naturally active & Egoistic. Egoistic people won’t submit that easily. So Azhwar took nAyikA BhAvam.
It is easy for us to submit to Perumal by showing our dependency on him.
Twameva Sharanam Mama
Sri Hanuman tells to Sita Piratti, I am your SON. You are my mother. Son can carry mother. So don’t think me as different matured male category.
This clearly means we are dependant on divine duo.
Perumal is the only male. We all are females.
We assume to be male now that is the problem.
That’s the reason Shankarar could have called
“Jagath Mithya”
Dasanudasan
Today’s enpani audio #2515 titled “நான் பக்தியில் முன்னேறுகிறேனா?” details about azwar’s bakthi, their view on nature and material world. Though swamy did not touch on the point நாயிகா பாவம், it appears he might have had this thread in mind and given the audio. Probably, he might not want to go into நாயிகா பாவம். Still not sure. However, the point is well taken.
Sri. Velukkudi Krishnan swamy, thank you for giving the audio. Would be very happy if it directly touches நாயிகா பாவம்.
adiyen
I used to wonder about the creator on reading the immense size of the universe and nature such as sea, clouds, mountain etc., during my teen age.
