Achit ulla antharyAmi irukkArA?

Updated on April 4, 2020 in Avatars
18 on October 17, 2019

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe SriVarAha MahAdEsikAya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam

Swamy,
Achit Ulla bhagavan iruppara? Illa jeevAthma ulla dhan iruppara?
Dasanudasan

 
  • Liked by
Reply
1 on October 17, 2019

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha,

 

Namaskaram,

Regarding “Achit Ulla bhagavan iruppara? Illa jeevAthma ulla dhan iruppara?

 

Refreshing Velukkudi Sri Krishnan Swami’s old enpani’s with Acharya ThiruvAdi Bhalam, Swami has said BhagavAn Sriman NarayanAn is “SARVA VYAPAGAN“, means BhagavAn is Present Everywhere inside Achit and Chit (எல்லார்க்கும் நன்மையை விரும்பி, எங்கும் நீக்கமற நிறைந்து இருக்கிறார்).

Means, an EXISTENCE of any object is possible, only when BhagavAn is present in that object. Swami says, as an example, pencil ✏️ or book or table or any Achit can exist only when BhagavAn is present inside them. We already know BhagavAn exist as “Antarathma” inside Chit (JeevAthma’s) from Swami’s enpani. So BhagavAn is Everywhere Inside an Achit and Chit as “VISHNUR” and Outside an Achit and Chit as “VISHWAM” as Swami says in Vishnu Sahasranaamam.

 

This is called “SARVA VYAPAGATVAM“, Hence BhagavAn is “VIPU (எங்கும் உள்ளான் கண்ணன், தூணிலும் இருப்பார், துரும்பிலும் இருப்பார், நமக்குள்ளும் இருப்பார்” as Swami says.

 

*****************

On a separate note, the question inside the thread looks reasonably correct version as “Achit Ulla bhagavan iruppara? for which the above said is the Answer referring to Swami’s Sorpozhivu, but looking at the main body subject “Achit ulla antharyAmi irukkArA? is a different perspective, for which the Answer is NO, since the terms “Sarva Vypagan, Antharathma, Antharyami..etc…”…refers to different aspects of BhagavAn and doesn’t mean the same. So the usage of these words in different sentences maynot go along. This is just for devareer’s information for future better understanding.

**********************

 

Adiyen Srinivasa (DhoddayAcharyar) Dasan

on October 20, 2019

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe SriVarAha MahAdEsikAya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Swamy,
We know jata bharathar jumped over ants while holding palanquin. He did not fly above Earth.

If Earth has antharyAmi then standing on Earth is also sin

Dasanudasan

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
2 on October 20, 2019

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha,

 

Yes. KongilPiratti Swamy already explained in the below thread link EXTRACTING THE ESSENCE from Swami’s Upanyasams.. So it is not a surprise. Adiyen will copy paste that portion again in this thread.

 

*************************
https://www.kinchit.org/dharma-sandeha/thread/தப்பு-செய்யதவாள-தப்பு-னு/

 

By KongilPiratti:

Another example is, we say we do ThiruAradhanai to Perumal with Bhakhi and Acharam and Anushtanam. Is this literally true. It is not True because, by MIND we know BRAHMAM (BhagavAn) is everywhere. So are we not standing by keeping our foot on floor (BRAHMAM). Isn’t this a paapam that we commit daily. We can provide a round about answer that “we shouldnot think that we are standing on top of BRAHMAM, we should only think that the Shaligramam or Small diety at home Perumal”,  but this cannot be digested if we have same thinking as “SukhaAcharyar” who considered BRAHMAM is everywhere and MOREOVER FELT BRAHMAM IS EVERYWHERE”.

 

Another example is, we go to bathroom for excretion, so “are we not realising that we are putting the excretion on BRAHMAM (BhagavAn) though HE is not in deity form, since BhagavAn us spread out as VIPU everywhere in Bathroom on the floor and we walk on HIM etc.... Isn’t this realisation make us uneasy. So how can we say,  we are a Devotee/Bhaktha?

 

So Swami says in Sharanagathy Gadyam, we have to pray to BhagavAn to FORGIVE all paapams done daily knowingly and unknowlingly, and we should importantly pray to BhagavAn that “please stop me from making paapams”. Further support BhagavAn needs to do.

 

So there is no other way around to say that “if one didn’t commit any mistakes”, since the fact is ANYONE in this samsaram is a daily Paapi either by MIND OR SPEECH OR BODILY ACTIONS, just the intensity of paapam varies from one person to another person. That’s it.

 

So the only thing that we can do is “HOW to reduce the Paapams, since Elimination of Paapams is impossible while we all are in this Samasram“. That’s how BgagavAn has done the PANCHIKARANAM, mixing all Satva, Rajas, Tamas gunas etc…..

***********************

 

Adiyen Srinivasa (DhoddayAcharyar) Dasan

on October 20, 2019

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe SriVarAha MahAdEsikAya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam

Swamy,

Yes this explanation makes sense and yes we ask for all forgiveness. Does it answer the question achit has Brahmam ? (Achit is shareeram to Brahmam that’s different)

Velukkudi Swamy has told we need to tell shlokams while bathing, while brushing teeth and so on.

Technically speaking everything we do revolves around here itself. The decay able and non decay able serves some purpose. The body we hold also decays at a point and even while living decays and becomes food to some organisms

The main issue is, the portion we have control of. Brahma hatya only applies to ? ant level insects and bigger?

The smaller nano level organisms also gets killed but we do not talk big about it.

Ofcourse everything is Brahmam in that sense. Then why only for ant level incident was highlighted for jata bharatha Swamy?

Adiyen also remember Thirumala nambi Swamy or some mahan who restored the prasAdham with ants on top of tirumala hills.

Is it okay to kill animals and ask forgiveness saying ” hey lord forgive all known and unknown sins”?

This may sound like vithandA vAdham but adiyen feel there is some essence to this question.

Let’s say adiyen Bang the door should I ask sorry to the door or not?

Dhanyosmi for taking time to answer it.

Dasanudasan

on October 21, 2019

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha,

Regarding devareer’s question “Does it answer the question achit has Brahmam ? (Achit is shareeram to Brahmam that’s different)”,

This question is same as the initial question “Achit Ulla bhagavan iruppara?, for which the answer from Swami’s audios about BhagavAn is “Sarva Vyapagan” was referred, which means Yes BhagavAn is present inside and outside All Achit and All Chit as in initial above reference answer from Swami’s audios. Swami has said, without BhagavAn inside any Achit (like pencil pen table gadgets etc..), the existence of that object is not possible..BhagavAn present inside them as Sarva VYAPAGAN, that’s why we are able to see those objects. Means, ஒரு பொருள் பொருளாக இருக்க வேண்டும் என்றால் அதற்குள் பகவான்

But looks like devareer jumped on to a different protracted question “standing on Earth is also a sin” which is a different added question, hence adiyen reffered KongilPiratti Swamy previous reference answer to that topic, since it struck adiyens memory, which devareer comprehended as “Yes this explanation makes sense and yes we ask for all forgiveness”, but sooner devareer repeated the same initial question in a different format as “Does it answer the question achit has Brahmam ? (Achit is shareeram to Brahmam that’s different)”.

Adiyen honestly not sure, if devareer has jumbled thoughts which is causing some road blocks in understanding BhagavAn’s “SARVA VYAPAGATVAM” or not. It’s not a big deal, since we all are like that. That’s why we are here to get answers from Velukkudi Swami. Either way, Adiyen is only referring Swami’s audios, if it all it will help others.

Adiyen Srinivasa (DhoddayAcharyar) Dasan

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on October 21, 2019

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha,

If devareer’s deep mind feel to ask sorry to the door due to banging, then devareer can ask sorry. If It is normal knocking on door to call someone or we are intentionally banging the door heavily reflecting our anger towards someone on to the door. The former behaviour is allowed, but latter behaviour is not healthy for us.
That’s why BhagavAn is sitting inside us to see how much TAMED (பக்குவம்) we are by following rules. It may sound crazy to others if we ask sorry to the door,
but dont bother, since BhagavAn is the judge to see how much we react (LOVE) HIM by respecting HIS BODY (all Achit’s plus all Chit’s).

Respecting All Achits means Respecting the Nature/பிரபஞ்சம். Use it responsibly and treat it responsibly.

Respecting All Chits means Respecting other fellow beings either worms or animals or human beings etc….

Then the next question that may pop-up is “does everyone behave good as said”, then the answer would be “let’s follow/practice the good and ethical behaviour first with BhagavAn’s grace/ Acharya ThiruvAdi Bhalam and then pray for others to follow and encourage the ones who are already following”. There are numerous Swami’s audios about தனி மனித ஒழுக்கம், பண்பு, பக்தி etc……

Adiyen Srinivasa (DhoddayAcharyar) Dasan.

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on October 23, 2019

Swamy
Bang on, this is what adiyen wanted
“without BhagavAn inside any Achit (like pencil pen table gadgets etc..), the existence of that object is not possible..”

Beautiful this answers everything
????????

Dasanudasan

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on October 23, 2019

Case closed
“ஒரு பொருள் பொருளாக இருக்க வேண்டும் என்றால் அதற்குள் பகவான்”

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on October 23, 2019

Sri:

Swamy,
Naana kekala jumbled thoughts vs your clear cut mind

“(Achit is shareeram to Brahmam that’s different)”.

Adiyen honestly not sure, if devareer has jumbled thoughts which is causing some road blocks in understanding BhagavAn’s “SARVA VYAPAGATVAM” or not. “

Veda says:


Anthar bahischa thath sarvam vyApya nArAyaNa sthitha:

So asked if that’s the case, when it accounts to Brahma hathya only if ShareerAthma Bandham is seperated?

Dasanudasan

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
5 on October 26, 2019

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha,

 

So now, it seems like, devareer acknowledge the answer “SARVA VYAPAGATVAM” that is referenced from Swami’s upanyasams for the initial question is clear. Yes “Narayana Suktham” says about it, devareer mentioned:

 

Yatcha kinchit jagat sarvam, drishyate sruyate pi va,
Antar bahischa tat sarvam, vyapya Narayana sthitah.”

[Whatever in this Universe is, either “seen” or “heard of”, or “pervading” all this from INSIDE and OUTSIDE all Chit’s and all Achit’s, stands THE Supreme THE Eternal Divine Being -Narayana]

 

Adiyen was able to locate Swami’s audio #05 about BhagavAn’s SARVA VYAPAGATVAM.

**********

Now, it seems devareer have a new CHAIN REACTION question related to BhagavAn’s Sarva Vypagatvam.

So asked if that’s the case, when it accounts to Brahma hathya only if ShareerAthma Bandham is seperated?

So, devareer to kindly please confirm what is devareer’s state of mind / conclusion of the question., Since it is unclear from the question, what devareer is trying to say about Brahma hatya. The reason why Adiyen ask this is because, Shastras say “Brahma Hatya” means “Killing a Brahmin” which is the highest PAAPAM/SIN one can acquire and such people are taken to Special Rehabilitation Places called Narakam/Hell. There is no other way around of escape, unless one cries on BhagavAn”s Lotus Feet, and it will he up to BhagavAn’s discretion “What Next” can get done. This is adiyen’s understanding from Swami’s upanyasams with Acharya ThiruvAdi Bhalam.

Or devareer had a different understanding about “the meaning of Brahma Hathya other than the one explained above by shastras.

 

So please clarify swami what is devareer’s view point relating BhagavAn’s Sarva Vyapagatvam Kalyana Gunam and a BhaddhAthma commiting the sin Brahma Hathya, so that Velukkudi Swami can understand the question.

 

Adiyen Srinivasa (DhoddayAcharyar) Dasan.

on October 31, 2019

Swamy,
Adiyen thought Brahma hathya means killing life not just Brahmin. As the name suggests it should not be just brahmin but any life form.

Adiyen never questioned bhagavAn’s Sarva vyApagathvam in first place. It was more like what is the “state” of Brahmam. Passive or active.

Prgnya and PrANan is to be the difference between chit and achit.
Dasanudasan

on October 31, 2019

Sri:

Prajnyaam Paraartha-Sulabhaam Paramaam Prasuute ||29||

29.4: For them the highest Attainment of Spiritual Wisdom will become easy by the Grace of the Supreme awakened in their

Quotations from Sri Venkatesa SuprabhAtham

Dasanudasan

on October 31, 2019

Sri:

29.4: For them the highest Attainment of Spiritual Wisdom will become easy by the Grace of the Supreme awakened in their Hearts.

Adiyen understand this is simple explanation by someone but adiyen read it as:

The one who has Pragnya consciously trying to attain God will become easier to reach him

Dasanudasan

on October 31, 2019

In achit the element of Pragnya is missing so it’s attainment to Moksham is out of question and it has always a degraded value to chits.

Meaning only with body-soul relationship karma happens.

Using karma we can go in pursuit of Brahmam (Swamy’s English Upanyasam title) .

Salvation is is the destination.

Our body itself is achit for that matter.

The question of jumping over ants by Jata Bharathar is confusing adiyen.

Body on body doesn’t matter. He himself asks who is fat who is slim?

Why bharathar jumped over ants? He is anyway not killing the soul? He has consciousness to life forms and lifelessness and not a complete kadam as he is supposed to be.

He can differentiate.

The original question still remains the same and devareer have answered nothing about it.

Dasanudasan

on October 31, 2019

Swamy,

Okay Jeeva hathi or AthmaHathi instead of Brahma hathi. Now this will make sense. Adiyen don’t want to question shAsthram if that is what the term is intended for.

Dasanudasan

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
1 on November 6, 2019

Srimathe Ramanuja Nmaha,

 

Namaskaram Vikram Swami,

Regarding devareer’s intial question “Achit Ulla bhagavan iruppara? Illa jeevAthma ulla dhan iruppara?

Yes, Achitthukulla Brahmam Irukkiraar from Swami’s Enpani #05 is the answer for the above initial question, Which is what adiyen tried to share it as  “Refreshing Velukkudi Sri Krishnan Swami’s old enpani’s with Acharya ThiruvAdi Bhalam, Swami has said BhagavAn Sriman NarayanAn is “SARVA VYAPAGAN“, means BhagavAn is Present Everywhere inside Achit and Chit (எல்லார்க்கும் நன்மையை விரும்பி, எங்கும் நீக்கமற நிறைந்து இருக்கிறார்)…………

 

However it looks like devareer’s real question in mind is “Why bharathar jumped over ants? He is anyway not killing the soul?”, looking at the above repeated posts, which doesn’t reflect in the initial question posted by devareer. How one will be able to interpret devareer’s mind unless devareer doesn’t translate the question in mind exactly in wordings. So devareer stating as “The original question still remains the same” is not correct Swami, since it is not properly laid down clearly.

If devareer would have asked the question is mind clearly as “Why bharathar jumped over ants? He is anyway not killing the soul?”,  then there is detailed different answer. For that, the “Vishista vesham nokku and Nishkrishta vesham nokku” needs to be understood from Swami’s upanyasams before giving the answer. Otherwise devareer is going to circumambulate on this topic for a while.

Adiyen’s intention is not trying to answer by pretending to be a scholar here, however adiyen is only trying to SHARE from Swami’s upanyasams, if adiyen have come across any answers to help others and as Kainkaryam to Velukkudi Swami.

 

Adiyen Srinivasa (DhaddayaAcharyar) Dasan

on November 9, 2019

Seri Swamy,
Adiyen is not questioning anyone’s pAndithyam here. Devareer interpreted adiyen’s question which was countered.

My initial view was Brahmam was there in ant he jumped this is what all Upanyasakars sAdhichadhu

Then question arises what about achit?

Devareer did not understand the question properly. The question title cannot exceed two lines so it was detailed in the description.

Vishishta vesham and nishkrishta nokam daysi koorndhu arul puriga

Dasanudasan

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on April 4, 2020

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha,

Velukkudi Sri Krishnan Swami has graced details in enpani #1700 உடலுக்குள்ளும் ஆத்மா உள்ளார்; நாற்க்காலிக்குள்?

Adiyen (ElayaAlwar) Srinivasa (DhoddayAcharyar) Dasan

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel