Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Sri Velukkudi Ranganathan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Sri:

Swamy,

Adiyen beg to disagree on different grounds
1. Dasarathan was not a Bhakthan but a father

Vishwamitrar says:
“Hey Dasarathan, you don’t know who SriRam is but I know Aham Vedmi MahAthmAman RAmam Sathya Parakramam”

2. Mother Yoshoda was about to fold her hands after Krishna opened his mouth but Krishnan wanted Prema BhAvam to be on top so used mAya to hide his supremacy

3. SriRam wanted more of Fatherly attachment in Srimath Ramayanam

This is evident when his childhood friend called him “dei Rama” then everybody got angry including Vasishtar , how can chakravarthy be called like that?

Sri Ram went hugged childhood friend saying ” After father only he is calling me like that”

We would have heard Kuchelar story but adiyen heard this story from KrupAnandA vAriyAr Swamy upanyasam

4. Self submission cannot be expected from a father to son therefore even being a parent of vibhava God, one cannot expect Moksham or archirAdhi mArgam unless self submission

5. If Dasarathan broke his promise, even SriRam wouldn’t have agreed.

This is evident from SriRam advising his mother to be with Dasarathan

Similarly, Krishna advised Gopa Sthrees to be with their respective husband

Only exception could be:
SAmanya Dharmam vs VisEsha Dharmam

If SriRam’s supremacy was little known Dasarathan would have retained SriRam

If Krishna’s supremacy was little known Bhisma would not let injustice to Draupathi

If Krishna’s supremacy was little known, Akroorar wouldn’t be doing his daily rituals in front of Krishna

Therefore , this can be attributed to Bhaghavath Leela & not to jeeva SwAthanthriyam. Only Bhagavath Agnya persists.

Lastly:
Swamy, devareer only told, we should not analyse who went to Moksham & who didn’t in one of EnPaNi. Now devareer giving justification, little perplexed.

Dasanudasan