Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Adiyen’s reaction is in this way
I please their ego saying “you are knowledgeable but as per veda Sriman Narayana is supreme may be as per you it may be different”
No point in fighting with them and calling ourselves SAthvikA purAnA followers
Diplomatic answers are the key
Only when it comes to talking bad about achArya I get angry no sAthvikam etc will be valid for me there
Secondly, we can say “The one who asked you to question is making me to answer”
Let us keep saying adiyen, dasan and dasanudasan
Yaarukkkagavum namba naichyAnusandhAnatha maathikka vendaam
Adiyen had conflicting opinions with a Shiva bhaktha, it was never ending and he kept quoting references
In veda even Varuna and Indra is held supreme and it’s obvious lord Shiva is not an exception
I said “As Shiva is to you, Same Narayana is to me but as per veda Sriman Narayana is Para Brahmam as he is antharyAmi to everyone ”
This means it’s our Sriman Narayana is residing inside all of them
Then with whom can we quarrel?
With your bhAgavatha sampandham he will become a parama bhAgavatha later
The colleague to whom adiyen taught “Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha” is telling more than me and am getting jealous
Even adiyen felt sometimes bad about veda after reading Wikipedia and forums
Practices like animal killing Bali for yAga, yagnyam etc
Recently velukkudi Krishnan Swami cleared my mind in EnPaNi 829
Yesterday my baby had dysentery , went to doctor Prahlad pediatrician
A sticker in front of his room “Keep your Google IQ outside before entering doctor’s room”
Velukkudi Krishnan Swami is the doctor and my Google IQ was kept aside in EnPaNI 829 at 9 min 14th second
“aana pannuvenu pidivadham pidithaal adhai eppadi thaukradhu?”
So veda prescribing a tougher act to restrict such practices
Apologies if adiyen said anything wrong
Dasanudasan