Yes but Sharaba Upanishad which mentions Lord Sharabha is a muktika 108 Upanishad and it comes at number 50 snd there are many hymns and stotras dedicated to it in Tattariya Arayanayaka and also in other Vedic literatures
Pls clear my doubt
Adiyen

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Sri:

We Sri VaishNavites accept only SAthvika PurANams.

The whole point of being a SriVaishNavite is to be a SAthvika.

In Veda many Gods given the room for supremacy. Including Agni, Indran etc.

In fact Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy has debunked the Devi puranam etc in very old upanyasams.

Only thing is our knowledge is limited to understand those heavy concepts.

Also by getting to know distorted form of our sampradhayam by saying this is told here and that is told there will lead us to the wrong path.

Again into this birth-death cycle. Narayana will let you discover on your own. “Ok then you find out and come to me”.

Why do you think “Brigu” maharishi went on in an endeavour to find SAthvika God? Is it for timepass?

Even when lord Shiva gave Markandeya Maharishi ever 16 years boon it is said that the AntharyAmi (indweller) Sriman NarayaNa was consulted.

This AntharyAmithvam of the Brahmam Sriman Narayana is the ultimate answer to all the questions of Vishnu Maya.

By the way Sri Hari will not kill himself in his own creation.

Lord Krishna, who could not die in a fireceful Mahabharata war left to his abode just by an arrow if a hunter? He wants us to believe it?

If we were to beleive this it means Krishna Maya overpowered us and his play (Leela) of Janma (Creation) , Sthema (Sustenance), Bhangam (Destruction) worked out well for him.

This is proved by Sri RamanujaAchArya in Mangala (Invocatory) Shlokam of Brahma Sutra Sri Bhashyam.

Akhila Bhuvana Janma Sthema BhangAdhi Leeley
(All credits to my Swamy Sri Velukkudi Krishnan for decrypting this in understandable form of Adiyen)

So to trust if Sriman Narayana is supreme or not again is a test given by the same lord check our integrity.

Time and again he will keep doing this. I know by experience..

We should not fall in that trap.

I argued Buddha was one of 10 avatar it is told here and there.

Then realised after holding the lotus feets of Sri RamanujAchAryA whatever Swamy says is TRUE.

Sathyam Sathyam Puna Sathyam YathirAjO Jagath Guru:

Dasanudasan

1) “Why Sarabeshwara didn’t kill Hiranyakashipu” – The story of Jaya and Vijaya and their curse is known to all
2) We accept only Sathvika puranas – One may choose to accept the Sathvika Puranas alone, but the others cannot be discarded/debunked. All the 18 Puranas were given by Veda Vyasa (incarnation of Lord Vishnu) himself

When the Upanishads and Puranas talk about Sarabeshwara – we are bound to accept his incarnation.

The ruling deity varies based on the sampradaya we adopt to. For a Sri Vaishnavite, Sriman Narayana is the ultimate Para-brahmam and all the other deities fall under him. Similarly, for a Saivite, Lord Shiva is the ultimate Para-brahmam and all the other deities fall under him. Both are true from their own perspective as the ultimate Para-brahmam is only one.

This is the matured way of understanding things rather than denying what’s already written in Upanishads/Puranas.

If all Upanishads and Puranas are written by Sri Ved Vyas then why does Sharabha Upanishad, which is authentic as it comes in the list of 108 Upanishads mentioned in Muktika Upanishad use the word killimg for Lord Nrsimha whereas Lord Nrsimha is said to have no beginning and no end in Nrsimha Tapaniya Upanishad. Why is there such a stark contrast which is very much confusing for a newbie in spirituality like me. Ply clarify this and enlighten me
Adiyen

Pls read the above and another thing I forgot to mention that why Sharabha Upanishad tells that Lord Shiva “killed” many like Matsya,Kurma, Varaha and Vamana and called Lord Vishnu …..egoistic. Pls help me as I want to be a hardcore Vaishnava

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha

1) “Why Sarabeshwara didn’t kill Hiranyakashipu” – The story of Jaya and Vijaya and their curse is known to all
VS: So devas had no other job than to plead Vishnu? May be Devas got Dementia.

2) We accept only Sathvika puranas – One may choose to accept the Sathvika Puranas alone, but the others cannot be discarded/debunked. All the 18 Puranas were given by Veda Vyasa (incarnation of Lord Vishnu) himself
VS: Reason for puranas answered in old thread by a learnef Swamin. After reading one may question the legitimacy or applicability.

We can’t ask a military man to go and do meditation in a warfield. Every purana had a purpose. Arjuna tried and failed.

“Sriman Narayana is the ultimate Para-brahmam and all the other deities fall under him. Similarly, for a Saivite, Lord Shiva is the ultimate Para-brahmam and all the other deities fall under him. Both are true”

VS: This is the most ridiculous understanding of Sampradhayam and conflicts Ekameva Adwitheryam Chandhoya Upanishad Sath Vidhya Prakaranam.

Sriman Narayana is supreme and it was proved by greats like Shankara, RamanujAchArya, Madhwa, Manavala Mamunjgal, Swamy Desikan.

Why go that far, this decade “Seva Swamy” proved it.

If one lives in denial, one cannot help but allow to discover on own.

While perspective is not the point of debate but TRUTH IS ONE i.e. SRIMAN NARAYANA

Veda Vyas is not mental to classify Puranas by Gunas

Dasanudasan

I just had one doubt that is there division of Upanishads like Satwa, Rajas and Tamas like Upanishads
Adiyen

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha

Yes, Adiyen

Dasanudasan