Sri:
Is there such a moment of questions getting dried up?
Dasanudasan
Some new age spiritualists say I have no more question to ask. Can it be true?
Updated on August 7, 2017 in
Good qualities for human
- Liked by
Hare Krishna! Aneha koti namaskaram Swami!
Bg 7.16 — பரதர்களில் சிறந்தவனே, நான்கு விதமான நல்லோர் எனக்குத் தொண்டு புரிகின்றனர்— துயருற்றோர், செல்வத்தை விரும்புவோர், கேள்வியுடையோர், பூரணத்தின் அறிவைத் தேடுவோர் என்பவர் அவர்கள்.
Bg 7.16 — O best among the Bhāratas, four kinds of pious men begin to render devotional service unto Me – the distressed, the desirer of wealth, the inquisitive, and he who is searching for knowledge of the Absolute.
The 1st 2 types are interested in something material and the later 2 types are interested in developing spiritual knowledge. When one elevates from type 3 to type 4, questions start to subside. And when one elevates from type 4 to “pure devotee” (who finds happiness only in serving Bhagavan / Bhagavatas), ends up with ‘no’ questions.
Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!
Hare Krishna! Aneha koti namaskaram Swami!
Dear Vikram swami – May be the question has 2 folds. 1 asking question 2 engaging into discussions to understand broader perspectives. Both are about enhancing (spiritual) knowledge. The former one is ‘primitive’ approach but the later one is more effective especially when coupled with ‘mutual’ sharing of ‘implementation’ experience of devotees.
Adiyen feels sorry to repeat the same point again i.e kainkaryam to Bhagavan/Bhagavatas (by saying that, does not mean anyway that Adiyen is practicing the same).
Till then, there is nothing wrong in asking questions or engaging into discussions but the destiny can only be reached through ‘kainkaryam’.
To Srinivasan swami, Kongil piratti & other devotees – Please share your views as well.
Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!
Hare Krishna! Aneha koti namaskaram Swami!
Dear Vikram swami – May be the question has 2 folds. 1 asking question 2 engaging into discussions. Both are about enhancing (spiritual) knowledge. The former one is ‘primitive’ approach but the later one is more effective especially when coupled with ‘mutual’ sharing of ‘implementation’ experience of devotees.
Kainkaryam to Bhagavan/Bhagavatas can only put an ‘end’ to the questions (by saying that, does not mean anyway that Adiyen is practicing the same). Till then, there is nothing wrong in asking questions. And we should always engage into discussions for it can not be stopped and is always recommended (in Bhagavad Gita by lord sri krishna)
Bg 10.9 — எனது தூய பக்தர்களின் சிந்தனைகள் என்னில் மூழ்கியுள்ளன. அவர்களது வாழ்க்கை எனது தொண்டிற்காக அர்ப்பணிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது. மேலும், என்னைப் பற்றி தங்களுக்குள் உரையாடுவதிலும் ஒருவருக்கொருவர் உபதேசித்துக் கொள்வதிலும் இவர்கள் பெரும் திருப்தியும் ஆனந்தமும் அடைகின்றனர்.
Bg 10.9 — The thoughts of My pure devotees dwell in Me, their lives are fully devoted to My service, and they derive great satisfaction and bliss from always enlightening one another and conversing about Me.
To Srinivasan swami, Kongil piratti & other devotees – Please share your views as well.
Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!
Aneka Koti Namaskarams Swami,
I do agree with you. The senses that are properly utilized to understand His glory and to do Kainkaryams to Him are only considered fulfilling their functions in one’s life.
What can give Anandham to a devotee other than discussing about the glories of Lord, doing Kainkaryams to Him, His devotees and willing to know His glory more and more?
Daasanu Daasan Srinivasan Pranesh.
Sarvam Shri Krishnaarpanamastu!
- Liked by
Adiyen feel such point of question getting dried up only can happen to super souls like Sukha Brahmam.
Adhu epdi questions illama irukka mudiyum?
The one who knows Krishna fully need not have any questions.
The one till he knows keeps getting such questions.
By the way what kind of Bhagavath or BhAgavatha kainkaryam are we talking about?
Adhan Ahankaram thadukkumey? Apuram eppudi kainkaryam?
Aduthava Pannina mattum dhan kainkaryam adhuvey naama pannina Ahankaram. This is what adiyen learned from discussing in these threads because Ahankaram will override us.
As long as we keep finding faults we are never going to improve.
ThurupAnAzhwar was recognised only after he was accepted by Perumal. Swamy was muni vaahanan only after Perumal called. Till that time Swamy was sidelined by the society.
Adiyen want to know why such indiscrimination by learned people or bhagavathas?
Are we talking about true SriVaishnavism in the path of Sri Ramanujar?
Where “Anyone who accepts my Sriman Narayana ” is a bhagavatha and I am devoted to him. No matter to what he belongs to.
Does this happen even today?
Dasanudasan
Hare Krishna!
Aneha koti namaskaram swami. If swami is open for discussion, Adiyen can share a ‘direct’ answer to this topic but that may sound little ‘strong’. As indicated earlier, by saying that, it does not mean Adiyen is doing that already, its only a message to reiterate the importance of message for Adiyen himself, so Adiyen starts practicing it sooner than later.
Please let me know if swami is giving permission to Adiyen, to share ‘direct’ answer to the question.
Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!
Please go ahead, adiyen
Thittinaalum paravailla illai
Adiyen will take it
Present day long bearded spiritualists say “I have no questions to ask because I know everything, am a yogi, mystic etc” (Don’t want to name organization)
Let everybody know
And make sure your answer is direct and strong but does not offend anyone’s sentiments as it will lead to your BhAgavatha apachAram even if adiyen or recipient keeps silence.
Dasanudasan
- Liked by
YOUR PREVIEW
0
0