Swamy, but acharya’s of our sampradayam do not consider veda vyasa as poorna avataram . They consider veda vyasar as an avesha avataram. That’s why there is no veda vyasa sannidhi in our visishtadvaita temples

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Sri:

Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy already answered. Avesha avathAram not a full avatar but for specific purpose. PerumAl’s amsam gets injected into that jeevan.

Parashuram avathAram is one such avesha avathAram.

Regarding PoorNathvam, Acharyas will have various parameters and scale. AcharyAs will say only on scaled basis i.e. Nahi NindA nyAyam.

Meaning one is better than the other.

When speaking of Sri Varaha PurANam, Sri Rama or Sri Krishna will be equalled. So, VarAhar is greater.

Same way for Narasimhan. He is Periya Periya Perumal better than Sri Ranganathan.

So we cannot take things in literal form. BHAGWAN IS ALWAYS POORNAN HOWEVER HIS AVATAR IS.

Anything wrong, Kshamikka Prarthikkiren.

Dasanudasan